Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:02:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#229187: fixed in lilo-installer 0.34 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2004 15:50:37 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 07:50:37 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postman4.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.0.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ak3Zt-0003Il-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:50:37 -0800 Received: from floeff1 (pD9546694.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.102.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id i0NFoUM4019273 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:50:31 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Florian Effenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lilo.conf has no comments anymore in Sarge Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:49:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: lilo Version: the one from the current Sarge netinstall CD lilo.conf has no comments anymore in Sarge, so it requires reading of the manpage more often. I would like to get back the old behavior of woody, where the most important settings were mentioned in that file as comments. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 229187-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2004 06:08:17 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 12 22:08:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B22Jl-0000hL-00; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:08:17 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B22Dr-0006jV-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:02:11 -0500 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.45 $ Subject: Bug#229187: fixed in lilo-installer 0.34 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:02:11 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Source: lilo-installer Source-Version: 0.34 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lilo-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lilo-installer_0.34.dsc to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.34.dsc lilo-installer_0.34.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.34.tar.gz lilo-installer_0.34_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.34_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lilo-installer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:25 -0500 Source: lilo-installer Binary: lilo-installer Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.34 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: lilo-installer - Install LILO on a hard disk (udeb) Closes: 221908 229187 Changes: lilo-installer (0.34) unstable; urgency=low . * Joshua Kwan - Use a nice big here-document, stolen from woody, that is a fully documented/commented lilo.conf. (Closes: #229187) - By consequence, this adds a sane delay value to the default lilo.conf. (Closes: #221908) * Translations: - Kęstutis Biliūnas - Updated Lithuanian translation (lt.po). - André Luís Lopes - Updated Brazilian Portuguese translation (pt_BR.po) - Andre Dahlqvist - Update Swedish translation (sv.po) - Peter Mann - Updated Slovak translation (sk.po) - Dafydd Harries : Added Welsh translation (cy.po) - Miroslav Kure: Updated Czech translation (cs.po) - Konstantinos Margaritis: Updated Greek translation (el.po) - Håvard Korsvoll - Updated Norwegian, nynorsk translation, (nn.po). - Jordi Mallach: Updated Catalan translation (ca.po) - Steinar H. Gunderson: Updated Norwegian Bokmål translation (nb.po). Files: 2b67e047073267203ea8076c3203ab04 637 debian-installer standard lilo-installer_0.34.dsc d4b3acf8255921ef412c90001ddb2c83 40821 debian-installer standard lilo-installer_0.34.tar.gz 673a8f8fb0b68743796db7007e2f9fc1 28538 debian-installer standard lilo-installer_0.34_i386.udeb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAUp9x2tp5zXiKP0wRAr9qAKCJ4yLo8kn/RDHD9VzwrbMIAERhjQCfelfg +kikCO08is2IOa677y9ol1M= =2z2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]