fre 2004-03-12 klockan 07.10 skrev Christian Perrier: > > cfdisk is not used on all architectures. There's also the queston of > > what to call partconf. > > In another thread, I suggested "Partition disks (expert)" for partconf > and "Partition disks" alone for partman.
First of all, unless there's been some serious hacking on partconf that I've missed, partconf doesn't do partitioning, so "Partition disks" is flat out wrong. Second, how is it more "expert" than partman? It can hardly do anything that partman can't, can it? /Martin
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
