Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224662: fixed in netcfg 0.49
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2003 19:52:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 20 13:52:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AXlBa-0001Tp-00; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:46:42 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9FE5C26B27; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C3D19FEAE; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:45:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 18:45:05 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netcfg wishlists, udhcpc|pump, intend /etc/network/interfaces
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily built from 17-Dec-2003
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
sarge-i386-netinst.iso 17-Dec-2003 07:34 120M
uname -a: 2.4.22
Date: Sat Dec 20 18:07:00 CET 2003
Method: boot from IDE CD-ROM, using netinst ISO
Machine: No-name desktop PC
Processor: AMD Duron 900 MHz
Memory: 448 MB
Root Device: IDE
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP]
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 AC97 Audio
Controller (rev 20)
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 42)
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX [Boomerang]
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model
64 Pro] (rev 15)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
This PC had two Ethernet devices, and one was connected to another machine
running a DHCP server. netcfg showed:
eth0: Ethernet or Fast Ethernet
eth1: Ethernet or Fast Ethernet
I selected eth1, but got an error. Unfortunately, it did not tell me at
all what was wrong! After a bit I found out that it called /sbin/pump
which failed with "error while loading shared libraries: libpopt.so.9:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory". I see pump is
being removed (#221227). I guess in netcfg-common.c, udhcpc should also be
preferred to pump, i.e. those lines swaped:
else if (stat("/sbin/pump", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = PUMP;
and:
else if (stat("/sbin/udhcpc", &stat_buf) == 0)
dhcp_client = UDHCPC;
Still, netcfg should show why the DHCP client failed. Also, since pump is
broken, it should definitely not be installed for beta2!
Also, the "eth1: Ethernet or Fast Ethernet" menu is nice, but damn if I
know what eth0 and eth1 are... it would be cool to show the name of the
device, perhaps that shown by lspci:
eth0: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102
eth1: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX
Since DHCP didn't work in the beginning (I later simply removed /sbin/pump
so it would use /sbin/udhcpc instead), I configured a static address. I
put in my info and was asked "Is this information correct?". I said "no",
and did the whole thing again. It rememberd the IP address I typed in
before, but it reset my gateway from 10.0.0.140 to 10.0.0.1.
Also, a /etc/network/interfaces entry is generated which looks like this:
iface eth1 inet static
address ...
netmask ...
Please format/intend this more nicely:
iface eth1 inet static
address ...
netmask ...
After boot, eth0 and eth1 suddenly changed! I told debian-installer to use
eth1 (the 3Com) for DHCP, but after reboot the 3Com was suddenly eth0!
Also, when base-config asked me to type a root password, I accidentally had
CAPS LOCK on. Perhaps you should recognize this and warn the user.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224662-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2004 06:08:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 27 22:08:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Awxdr-0000o2-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:08:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwxY3-0006Xt-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#224662: fixed in netcfg 0.49
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:02:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level:
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.49
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.49.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.49.dsc
netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
netcfg_0.49_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.49_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netcfg package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:08:46 -0800
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
netcfg - Configure the network (udeb)
netcfg-dhcp - Configure the network via DHCP (udeb)
netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 224662 234311 234395
Changes:
netcfg (0.49) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Joshua Kwan:
- Make netcfg read /etc/network/devnames (generated by ethdetect and
hw-detect) to show names of ethernet devices in the interface
selection menu. Will _not_ work for PCMCIA devices ... yet.
(Closes: #224662, #234311, #234395)
* Translations:
- Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pe~na
- Updated Spanish translation
- Ming Hua
- Initial Traditional Chinese translation (zh_TW.po), by Tetralet
- Updated Traditional Chinese translation (zh_TW.po), by Tetralet
Files:
0bdb0af73881afa1e44ed632d45f2140 1473 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.49.dsc
2a564debd07a37bb6f1c41fc32553088 128708 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.49.tar.gz
5e645057009582b5ce2514a99668deaf 98684 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.49_i386.udeb
a4ed51d6d5c4ca4000ba7a54ac7b4884 74450 debian-installer optional
netcfg-dhcp_0.49_i386.udeb
39c83af880c84719798cd59c35611d4b 84034 debian-installer optional
netcfg-static_0.49_i386.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=nXxZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
