On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:56:08AM -0800, Fabrice Gautier wrote: > > --- Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:00:09AM -0800, Fabrice > > Gautier wrote: > > > Package: installation-reports > > > > > > Debian-installer-version: daily 2004-02-25 > > business > > > card and netinst. From gluck.debian.org. > > > Date: 2004-02-26 3am PST > [...] > > > > > > Output of lspci: n/a > > Please send that output. > > It contains information about the e100. > > > > Please also provide > > lspci -n > > > > > > I dont have access to the machine right now, so im not > gonna restart the install but I believe there is > everything needed in the first lines of the first > attachment... > (Granted there's only the text description, and not > the IDs, the IDs would be "Class 0200: 8086:1229 (rev > 08)" for the eepro100 in this case)
It are indeed the IDs that where missing. 80861229 matches eepro100 in the discover data. ( http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=pkg-discover discover1-data the file pci.lst ) The eepro100 module is in kernel/linux-kernel-di/modules/i386/nic-extra-modules of the debian-installer CVS module, also at alioth. IIRC the nic-etra-modules floppy has to be loaded addtionally. BTW, you can run lspci on a installed computer. > > > > > Attached are the log for the business card > > install. > > > > Did you realize how much that was? > > Yes, 96K. I dont think thats too much for bug report > information, the BTS didnt complain. > > If you think this is too much, you should fill a bug > against the BTS so that it either doesnt accept > reports > xx k or at least doesnt forward the > attachements to the mainteners. I belief in education of users, telling them they are flooding the people that they are asking for help or a fix. Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
