Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:57:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2004 18:40:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 20 10:40:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from n219076099001.netvigator.com (imsmq01.netvigator.com) [219.76.99.1]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AuFZd-0005lW-00; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:40:29 -0800
Received: (qmail 27903 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 18:40:22 -0000
Received: from n219078166028.netvigator.com (HELO gnupilgrims.org) (219.78.166.28)
by imsmq01.netvigator.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 18:40:22 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:40:56 +0800
From: Hing-Wah Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation report for debian installer beta 2 on Samsung Q20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian installer beta 2
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 2/21 2:29a,
Method: <How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from where? Proxied?>
Net install,since the installer doesn't support my IEEE1394 cd-rom , I would
appreciate if ieee1394.o and sbp2.o can be included in cdrom modules dirver.
Install from mirror http://ftp.hk.debian.org,no proxy.
Machine: Samsung Q20
Processor:1.1G
Memory: 512RAM
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 4 parition, 1 1-GB ntfs ,1 ext3 for / ,1 ext3 for /home, 1
for swap <Feel free to paste the full partition
Output of lspci: not available since installation is not finished
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [E]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
A first try of installing base system got the following in the end of deboostrap.log:
/* skip*/
dpkg: depency problems prevent configuration of lilo:
lilo depends on libdevmapping1.00; however:
Package libdevmapper1.00 is not installed
/* skip */
Errors were encounted while processing:
lilo
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep: not found
A second time retry install base system(without rebooting), got the following error:
ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: File exists
umount: /target/dev/pts: Invalid argument
umount: /target/dev/shm: Invalid argument
umount : /target/proc/bus/usb: Invalid argument.
Retries of installing base still got the umount error message and installation failed.
Thanks
<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234209-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 18:57:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 10:57:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aw4EA-00052R-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:57:50 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-37.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.37])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDA917E56
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:57:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 90F7E6F359; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:57:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:57:55 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This was a debootstrap bug, and is now fixed.
--=20
see shy jo
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAPPAzd8HHehbQuO8RAo77AJ9+mrSUzzawDdEoNBZ4U1BPzHrj+gCg03vl
QeVqg+6M0jPIvelx2ZD4c10=
=TTUa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
