* "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-24 13:15:08 +0100]: > Or perhaps more the _packaging_. Debian has lots and lots of software > packaged, most of which is of extremely good quality. The Debian > policy is IMO a lot more important than using a specific package > system.
Yeah, I was sort of including the QA process under the umbrella of the "package management" term, but you're right that the two concepts should be brought up separately. After all, it's only the heightened attention to detail and diligence that allows the tools to be as strong as they are in the first place (see my comment in the previous email about apt-listchanges). Speaking of apt-listchanges, I know this is OT but does anyone happen to know why, as of a not-so-recent-anymore version, the followup changelog mailings are showing up with everything all jumbled together, like there aren't any line breaks or something? I thought it might be a character set thing, but I tried both us-ascii and iso-8859-1. -- John ! EVERYTHING I EVER NEEDED TO KNOW I LEARNED FROM GAMING Buttery! Never summon anything bigger than your head. www.io.c! Don't sweat the small stuff. Gnomes, for example. om/~john! A rod of silence means never having to say you're sorry.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
