On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:17:39PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:02:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Although the difference isn't that large in the case of "nl_BE" vs. > > "nl_NL" (thanks to the euro), there is a difference; so even if in a > > given case, assigning nl_NL to LC_MESSAGES has the same result as > > assigning nl_BE to that same variable, there may still be a > > significant difference. > > > OK, this assumes that the code actually cares about those other parts of > > i18n which isn't the case in most situations, but still... > > Is this all theoretical, or can you think of a concrete case where l10n > is used for something other than LC_MESSAGES in d-i proper?
I don't know whether it actually is the case; however, d-i should certainly use LC_TIME (when setting the time, displaying ETA's, etc) -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
