On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:33:06AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Robert Millan] > > I (as GRUB co-maintainer) have discussed with Jason the possibility > > of GRUB being the default bootloader for i386 in Debian 3.1, and we > > agree that GRUB is now mature enough for that. > > Sounds good. I would also use grub as the default. We do it already > in Skolelinux.
Let's wait a while to ensure there are no objections. When this happens, what is the component in charge for choosing the bootloader? > GRUB need to install automatically using the grub-installer udeb. I > believe only bug #219833 is blocking this at the moment. > > I suggest that grub-installer should be co-maintained by the grub > maintainers. This would make it easier to make sure the d-i part is > in sync with the grub part. The packages might even be built from the > same source, if you want that. What do you think? Sounds good. Including grub2, that makes us have 3 grub-related packages. I think at this point we should create a mailing list in our project at Alioth (pkg-grub) for maintaining these. Jason, any comments? -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
