Hi, > Mmm, maybe it should be possible to create a proper kernel package for > your boxes, could you send me a .config file for a 2.4.22 kernel ? Will > the standard linuxppc_2_4 tree do, or do you need special patches ?
We need to get the 64bit ppc cross compiler into debian, it sounded like there are a few people working on this. > Well, this would need the corresponding magic to be added arch-detect. I > guess ppc64 uses ppc userland, right ? Could you provide us with the > output of lspci ? Or maybe hack arch-detect yourself ? Yes, almost all of our userspace is shared with ppc32. archdetect looks to be doing the correct thing, on my ppc64 box it reports: powerpc/chrp >From a quick look around one problem seems to be the output of udpkg --print-architecture. How does this (untested as of yet) patch look? diff -u -r1.44 udpkg.c --- tools/udpkg/udpkg.c 2 Nov 2003 15:55:30 -0000 1.44 +++ tools/udpkg/udpkg.c 15 Nov 2003 06:29:26 -0000 @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ { "parisc", "hppa" }, { "parisc64", "hppa" }, { "ppc", "powerpc"}, + { "ppc64", "powerpc"}, }; if (uname(&name) < 0) > Same as above, d-i doesn't support subarches yet. That said, parted > should be available, and normally you should be able to use partitioner > and/or autopartkit transparently. What partitioning scheme are your box > using ? It uses standard DOS partitions. I usually use fdisk to create them. > Mmm, no idea about this one, maybe a special 2.6 kernel support for d-i > would be nice to have, a bit like woody's boot-floppies supported 2.2 > and 2.4 kernels ? As Christoph mentioned, calling it tmpfs should work across 2.4 and 2.6. Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]