Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Do you mean this part? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > echo -n > $APTDIR/state/status > for i in $LIBC_NAME libnewt0.51 libdebconfclient0 libdebian-installer4 \ > libdb1-compat libpopt0 slang1a-utf8 libuuid1 libparted1.6-0; do > dpkg -s $i >> $APTDIR/state/status > done > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Somehow that was neccessary to get apt to download debs or so I > thought. I just commented that out and did a fresh build without > error.
Yeah, that was it. > > Though there are now two sources.lists (.deb, .udeb), > > sources.list.local is still used as the sole override for both. I > > don't see how that can possibly work. > > You put a source for main and main/debian-installer in .local and it > finds everything. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/d-i/build# cat sources.list.local > deb ftp://dual/debian sid main > deb ftp://dual/debian-installer sid main/debian-installer > > The split between .deb and .udeb is just for you so you don't have to > download the main/binary-arch/Packages file over modem to build > floppies. Your request made the split neccessary. I can split the > .local file too if you like. Ah, I see. Ok, I didn't realize that would work. > How about the following release names: > > floppy/bootfloppy.img > floppy/rootfloppy.img > floppy/drivers_net.img > floppy/drivers_cd.img These are all perfect IMHO. > network/linux-<flavour> (amiga, atari, ...) > network/initrd-<flavour>.gz > hd-media/linux-<flavour> > hd-media/initrd-<flavout>.gz For hd-media, the bootfloppy currently looks for a file named initrd.gz on the disk, so it would be useful if it had that name. Of course I could hardcode the flavor in, or look for initrd*. It's not clear to me what the flavour would be for i386. I'd still prefer a better name than "hd-media", but nobody has come up with one yet. > cdrom/cdromboot.iso (bad name. Its a cdrom for when netboot > doesn't work) network/bootcdrom.iso? > cdrom/netinstall.iso (12MB with udebs) > cdrom/businesscard.iso (50MB with udebs and base) > kernel/linux-<flavour> (to be linked into net and hd) Seems ok, no strong preferences. > initrd/initrd-<flavour>.gz Not clear what this last initrd is for. > > - build/tmp/ > > > > After a "make TYPE=floppy", I have directories like > > tmp/tree-floppy-boot-boot, but the actual tree has apparently been > > removed from these directories after the initrd was made. Those trees > > are very useful for debugging and should be retained until make clean. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/d-i/build# du -h --max-depth 1 tmp > 4.8M tmp/tree-initrd-boot > 2.3M tmp/tree-cdrom-boot-none-none > 2.3M tmp/tree-floppy-boot-boot > 4.8M tmp/tree-initrd-udeb > 12M tmp/tree-cdrom-udeb-all-none > 2.3M tmp/tree-floppy-boot-udeb > 4.8M tmp/tree-initrd-base > 52M tmp/tree-cdrom-base-all-base > 2.3M tmp/tree-floppy-boot-base > 4.4M tmp/tree-initrd-netboot > 5.2M tmp/tree-initrd-demo > 6.9M tmp/tree-initrd-hd_media > 1.1M tmp/tree-floppy-data-drivers_cd > 1.2M tmp/tree-floppy-data-drivers_net > 1.6M tmp/tree-initrd-bootfloppy > 1.4M tmp/tree-floppy-boot-bootfloppy > 4.2M tmp/tree-initrd-root > 1.4M tmp/tree-floppy-root-root > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/d-i/build# ls tmp/tree-floppy-boot-boot > initrd.gz linux syslinux.cfg > > Works here. Right, I have those directories, but they only have initrd, linux, etc in them. No unpacked initrd build tree. > > - arch/linux-m68k contains the comment "Still using the old -udeb.udebs > > for now", but the next line uses the -di version. > > 2 out of 3 archs are. :) > > Worked on making -di work for m68k flavours? I had to link > 2.4.20-amiga -> 2.4.20 for the amiga -di.udebs as I told you on irc. AFAIK all that should be resolved in CVS, unless you've looked at it in the past 16 hours +-. I have amiga udebs building, they look fine. > > - arch/linux has the commented out INITRD_FS=ext2 which I removed from > > build/ last week. Probably symptomatic of an incomplete merge to > > trunk. > > > > - arch/linux-alpha is missing the "Still using the old -udeb.udeb's, for > > now.." comment that I added last week. > > Awaiting your -di alpha udebs :) They got out of NEW yesterday, I have no way to test them of course. > > - The README refers to "make listtypes", but that target does not exist. > > > > - The README refers to "make sources.list", when that has been renamed > > to "sources.list.udeb". However, I think this step should be removed > > from the makefile entirely, as it happens automatically now. > > > > - The README goes on to refer to sources.list some more, and > > sources.list.local. > > README is from HEAD. Ok, it still needs to be updated. > > - pcmcia-cs-udeb needs to be moved to net_drivers (more missing merging > > from HEAD). > > I copied the HEAD pkg-lists to net_drivers. Must have been changed > after I updated. That change was made 2 days ago yes, right after your good merging work. > > - TYPE=hd-media does not work. > > Will fix. > > Do we actually want to keep using TYPE=xxx? Do we want or need > config/TYPE/? I like the fact that you have them for bacwards compatability for now. In the absense of type, we have to use make dest/foo, right? Depends on the layout of dest and whether eg, make dest/floppy will work to build all floppy images, I suppose. > I was thinking of making a list: > > #filename arch type target > #---------------------------------------------------------------------- > dest/floppy/bootfloppy.img i386,alpha floppy > tmp/floppy-boot-bootfloppy.img > dest/cdrom/businesscard.iso all cdrom tmp/cdrom-base-all-base.img > > If TYPE= is given the list would be filtered for the type. > If no line with the right arch or all remains the makefile refuses to > build that TYPE. > > If no or TYPE=all is given all targets for that arch are build. Yeah, that has advantages over makefile fragments in config/type. It's also less extensible of course. I would like an easy way to build all of dest except for the cd images that contain debs, FWIW. > > taken sanely indented code[1] that I wrote for d-i, and wrecked the > > indentation with their own idea of what's "right". You're welcome to > > use any indentation you like in your own code, but I consider > > reindenting someone else's code behind their back to be quite rude, > > especially if they're still actively maintaining it. Frankly, this > > reindentation nonsense has been one of the more annoying things for me > > as I have came back to working on d-i, and while it was excusable to > > eg, reindent main-menu and anna when I was not working on them > > anymore, that excuse does not apply here. Revert pls. > > Aehm, reindenting to Makefile syntax? You want a "1 tab per indent" > indentation? I wasn't ranting about the removal of the mandatory makefile tabs, but all the tabs to the right of them. Anyhow. Just a rant. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
