Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:01:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Can someone explain to me what features are in the new busybox that > > prevents us from using regular old busybox? TIA. > > go away
I'm sorry, but I just cannot accept that as an answer. I am one of the two or three principle co-maintainers of the build/ directory, and so I need to know why stuff is in the pkg-lists. If I don't know, I cannot make good decisions and do my job. Currently the pkg-lists have things like this: # The busybox-cvs udeb is included as a workaround for the broken # busybox-cvs-net-udeb. Should be reverted when it works again. # XXX surely it's fixed by now? What was the issue? busybox-cvs-udeb -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
