Your message dated 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 18:50:27 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 06 12:50:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pieck.student.uva.nl [146.50.96.22] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18gr6Q-0000Dr-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:50:26 -0600 Received: from baardmijt ([146.50.160.23]) by pieck.student.uva.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id H9WHO100.J12 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:50:25 +0100 Received: from roodbaard ([192.168.13.2]) by baardmijt with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gr6N-0001MW-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100 Received: from tdykstra by roodbaard with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18gr6N-00009X-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100 From: "Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: choose-mirror: Can't change mirror if first one doesn't work X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: choose-mirror Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06 Severity: normal I'm not really sure if this is a bug in this package or rather in the one that generates the menu of the installer... but here goes. Somewhere in the process of installing I was asked to choose a mirror. It turned out that the one I chose didn't work. After that I couldn't try another one, none of the menu-entries would let me do that. That is of course really annoying. grts Tim -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux roodbaard 2.4.20 #1 di jan 14 22:17:08 CET 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------- Received: (at 180032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2003 21:19:49 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 24 15:19:48 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp.gu.se [130.241.150.66] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18nQ0p-0005vP-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:19:47 -0600 Received: from sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se (sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se [193.11.232.159]) by smtp.gu.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1OLJkXO025691; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:19:46 +0100 Subject: Re: Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx" Organization: Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: --=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable m=E5n 2003-02-24 klockan 21.58 skrev Thomas Viehmann: > Hi. >=20 > Martin Sj=F6gren wrote: > > I don't see how these bug reports are related at all. Isn't this more o= f > > a cdebconf issue? It fails and everything goes boom. I think you should > > report this on cdebconf instead. > Like the submitter, I had a problem with the download mirror and tried to= change it. > >From the original bugreport I figured that he had got back to the main m= enu. > Also, like him and you, I believe that this is probably a cdebconf proble= m. This is solved anyway, since I uploaded a new choose-mirror that has its own menu entry. Too bad I'd forgotten about this bug so it isn't in the changelog. I'm closing it now instead. > So to me it looked as it was the same bug, that's why I didn't file a new= one. > (I can do so, though, if you prefer.) It probably needs to be reassigned. > However, I don't think I'm qualified to reassign this bug. Sorry for not > pointing this out more clearly. Obviously something's wrong with cdebconf in your case (what did you do?) and it should handle it more gracefully. I think you should file a bug on cdebconf. /Martin --=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+WoxuGpBPiZwE9FYRAufSAKCP7Fhc+Shuju0EJu17pgSWQBAx+wCeIeXt +yIIgAqFBo8PjICkBc1Vizg= =aQKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]