Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:24:17PM +0200 wrote: > I'm just curious, why is libd-i built as it is, every function in a > separate .o?
The logic is that it allows us to provide a shared reduced version of libd-i, or to statically link only the objects we need. > > I will probably move some package file parsing into libd-i and I want to > know how to do this. Still one file per function I add, or one file for > all the package-related functions? Should I start a new .c file for > this? If it looks like a separate .c files make sense, do that, it is up to you. -David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
