On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:17:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:57:22AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote: > > we don't need real developing in b-f. B-f should only a fall back for > > sarge, if d-i is not ready. > > I suppose it was a while ago now, but it's still a bit sad that people > are forgetting this is _exactly_ what we were saying for woody.
I know this. > b-f's as a fallback doesn't work, it's too thorougly unmaintainable. Or > installation system needs _major_ work, easy solutions like "just fall > back to boot-floppies" *don't* work. If we don't add new architecture and new features, it should work. If someone like new features (LVM etc.), if someone like a new architecture (Hurd, BSD, ...), if someone like some other improvments, they all should work on d-i. I hope we get d-i stable and I hope we can use it with sarge. But we/you should not wait for d-i a long time and delay the sarge release. Stop _developing_ on b-f. But find some debian maintainer (like Edward) who _maintain_ b-f for some time. Gruss Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debsupport.de PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux "Wer in Reih und Glied marschiert, hat bereits meine Verachtung verdient" -- Albert Einstein... So let's install Linux!
msg21040/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
