On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 14:01, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 11:56, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 11:13, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> (2025-01-15): > > > > I plan to split out udev-udeb and libudev1-udeb from the current > > > > src:systemd source package/repo into a new src:systemd-udeb (forked > > > > from the old one, so generated udebs will be the same). > > > > > > The current set of packages doesn't work as the shlibs now only > > > references the libudev1 deb (without the extra udeb line), and > > > mdadm-udeb just picked up a dependency on libudev1. > > > > > > (I'll file the mdadm bug report later on, I'm on my way out.) > > > > Thanks for the report, this looks like to be the problem, in DEBIAN/shlibs: > > > > libudev 1 libudev1 (>= 257.2) > > udeb: libudev 1 libudev1-udeb (>= 257.2) > > > > became > > > > libudev 1 libudev1 (>= 257.2) > > > > I'll do a few experiments and upload a fix as soon as I have it > > Ok I have a fix that results in: > > Package: mdadm-udeb > Source: mdadm > Version: 4.4-2 > Architecture: amd64 > Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org> > Installed-Size: 1040 > Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.40), libudev1-udeb (>= 247) > > Which looks correct to me, so I'll upload that. mdadm will require a > rebuild afterwards. Thanks for finding this!
The fix is in unstable for all release arches, and I've re-tested the mdadm build and the generated dependencies look correct, so mdadm can be rebuilt now and it should work again. Please let me know if more such issues appear.
