Hi, Pascal Hambourg <pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:44:27 +0100): > In a perfect world, all boot loaders would support /boot on ext4 and we > would not have to make trade-offs. Indeed we must make a trade-off > between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem > vs small separate /boot) and compatibility with boot loaders. And I > believe we can do it right at least for use cases we know about. You > addressed the case of guided partitioning without LVM on ppc64el, why
without -> with ^^^ > not do the same for guided partitioning without LVM ? Do you think that > the robustness or convenience gain of not having a separate ext2 /boot > partition is worth the loss of compatibility with Petitboot ? Ok, so I have now changed that, to create a separate ext2 /boot partition for the non-lvm case as well. Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
