On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 6:12 AM Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2024-12-29): > > I can't believe this just happened. > > > > There was no advance warning for the installer team (that I'm aware of), > > the removal not only removed the package from unstable but also from > > testing right afterwards, which just sent the D-I Trixie Alpha 1 preps > > flying in million pieces. > > > > Spotted while rebuilding an image locally, where the tooling suddenly > > stopped finding usr-is-merged, while #1091649 was getting filed by > > Andrey (thank you). > > > > Any chance that could be reverted? > Oh no. I assumed this was all coordinated. We can't revert although that looks like no longer a factor judging by the next bit here: > And since I don't anticipate a revert to be either possible or > well-known territory, 39+nmu1 on its way. > This looks to have been successful. If anyone needs a hand with anything (NEW or other changes to the archive), consider me on the hook. > diffoscope confirms, comparing 39 binaries and 39+nmu1 ones: > - the usr-is-merged binary is identical except for the extra changelog > entry and different timestamps; > - ditto for the usrmerge binary, with also dh_installdeb/13.11.9 vs. > dh_installdeb/13.23 in comments above the debhelper-added snippets. > > AFAICT there should be no functional changes there. > > > Cheers, > -- > Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> > D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant > -- :wq
