Cyril and Phil,
Thank you both for your efforts to solve this.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 2:29 PM Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2024-11-28):
> > Looping in debian-cd@, who is responsible for image builds. There are
> > no linux-image* debs mentioned in list-cd indeed. linux got uploaded
> > on Saturday, but linux-signed-* only came in on Monday, which is
> > weekly image build day. Not sure that explains everything though.
>
> This looks like some size issue.
>
> Using easy-build locally, I can build an amd64 NETINST for bookworm just
> fine, which includes linux-image-* packages (metapackage + expected real
> package), but attempting a sid build results in missing linux-image-*
> packages.
>
> The sid log mentions:
>
> CD 1 filled with 845 packages, 325632 blocks, 666894336 bytes
>
> while list.mid mentions:
>
> 891:amd64:main:linux-image-6.11.10-amd64:104175924:linux
> 892:amd64:main:linux-image-amd64:1464:
>
> Right now I'm seeing modules for 10 kernel ABIs, that can't help. I lost
> count of how critical it is to have firmware-nvidia-graphics available
> (I thought it wasn't of much use, and was initially expected not to move
> to nff for bookworm, which it did eventually anyway), but that one alone
> steals 30+ MB of space before linux-image-*.
>
> I haven't looked deeper at this point, maybe we have some other kinds of
> “duplication” (not sure the t64 thing is over at this point, but I could
> imagine how we might pull t64 and pre-t64 libraries until everything is
> successfully rebuilt against the t64 ones).
Q.v., #1084789 - debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple
versions of module udebs:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084789
Thanks again,
Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois
