(Adding debian-boot@ back, and quoting in full accordingly.) Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> (2024-11-15): > # for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on > # tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility > reassign 1087324 haveged > thanks > > On 11/11/24 13:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > haveged doesn't start at all in d-i, and that's not an apparmor issue > > (#1087318): > > I'll check, thanks for reporting. > > > While haveged is supposed to be less critical than it used to be at the > > time it was added to the installer, I don't remember seeing a study > > making it clear it can be removed. > > I think the udeb should be removed right after trixie, it's only useful > in very limited edge cases when running specific workloads (of installed > systems).
Please don't drop it before getting a green light from our side. I really want some investigation to happen first. Last time I've been told “it's no longer useful” that wasn't true, at all. > > At this point of the release cycle, I'd rather see haveged fixed > > anyway. > > of course. > > Regards, > Daniel Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
