Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> (2024-10-29):
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:22:36PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > [ Reason ]
> > Requested by Helmut Grohne on behalf of the cross team.
> >
> > [ Impact ]
> > If not approved, backports of packages that participate in bootstrapping
> > and have had their build-dependency on libglib2.0-dev{,-bin} relaxed to
> > a build-dependency on the new smaller packages libgio-2.0-dev{,-bin} will
> > need to revert that change.
> >
> > [ Tests ]
> > diffoscope reports that there are no changes to the actual binaries, other
> > than the new Provides, the version number and some timestamps.
> >
> > I successfully built
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libverto/-/tree/wip/smcv/sample-bokworm-backport?ref_type=heads
> > (which is based on #1082732 and uses libgio-2.0-dev) in a bookworm
> > environment, and it pulls in libglib2.0-dev instead, as desired.
> >
> > I also successfully built
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libportal/-/tree/wip/smcv/nogir
> > (which uses libgio-2.0-dev and libgio-2.0-dev-bin) in a bookworm
> > environment without further source changes by using the nogir build-profile,
> > and it pulls in libglib2.0-dev{,-bin} instead, as desired.
> >
> > An upgraded bookworm GNOME desktop system runs successfully.
>
> d-i ack required for the udeb; in CC.No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
