Daniel Lewart <lewa...@gmail.com> (2024-10-08): > Package: d-i.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > > Dear Debian Installer Maintainers, > > debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (Trixie) has recently grown in size, > both daily and weekly builds. > > linux-image is version 6.10.11-1, but there are multiple versions > of module udebs in the pool. E.g.: > * btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb > > Is there any reason to have non-6.10.11-1 versions of the module udebs? > > If not, then the image should be able to shrink by 9% or so.
Looping in debian-cd@, who is responsible for those images. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
