Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote (Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:23:43 +0200): > Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2024-10-03): > > And that logic in tests/desktop controls indeed, if desktop task > > is pre-selected. > > Maybe it's time to raise that limit once again? > > Yeah, that looks plausible. > > > Of course, one might ask, what has changed in the last few weeks: > > that might be the size of partition (however since you used the > > small_disk recipe, that should only be marginal), or maybe some > > dependencies have changed at some point, so that more packages > > are now included in the default desktop. > > > > But either way, at the end we will need to raise the limit above by > > 1 or 2G anyway, to get this solved IMO. > > That would work for me, yes: I think it's better to provide safe > defaults, and let people who want to have a desktop environment select > it; maybe they'll get lucky and it'll fit, maybe that won't be the case. > > Seems better than selecting something by default without being sure it > does fit?
Sure. Tests show, that raising the limit by 1G to 4G brings back the old behaviour (no desktop task pre-selected), but to be a bit prepared for future growth, I would propose to go to 5G here? Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
