On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 20:38, Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 07:49:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > >Hi > > > >bluca just announced that he is going on a rampage after the CTTE > >decided not to hear him. As this is the second time within a few weeks > >just within the confines of #debian-boot, please remove him from the > >"installer-team" on salsa, until he manages to stop this.
I am not sure what you are talking about - the last changes I've done in D-I are adding optional support for systemd-boot: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/06/msg00013.html https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/systemd-boot-installer https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-utils/-/merge_requests/12 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/merge_requests/17 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/46 Everyone else seemed fine with that? What problem do you have with this feature exactly? Why do you object to having optional support for an alternative bootloader in the installer? Before that, I fixed some bugs and added support for a new cryptsetup feature to partman-crypto: https://bugs.debian.org/1017542 https://bugs.debian.org/1053678 https://bugs.debian.org/1060422 Again nobody seemed to have a problem with any of that. That's the extent of my work on debian-boot. In what universe is any of this a "rampage"? Aren't you exaggerating just a little bit? I don't think this is an appropriate way to refer to the work of a fellow developer, even if you don't personally like it for your own reasons. > >Evidence from #debian-systemd: > > > >| 18:52 < bluca> I've already changed live-build to write a local > >etc/os-release, will do debootstrap next > >| 18:53 < bluca> that should be enough for you to close those lsb-release > >bugs > > I've just dropped Luca's access to the installer-team to "Guest" for > now. That exchange is referring to implementing this suggestion from Timo and Marc, which I happen to like a lot: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077764#303 It has nothing to do with D-I, and also I am not sure what the exact problem with the proposed change would be, and why would it warrant removing Salsa access? Can you please elaborate?
