Hi Kibi, thank you for your comment and explanation!
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > […] > > The versioning seems a little weird. > > Usually: > - either one cherry-picks stuff on top of the stable package, and uses > 0.76+deb12u1; > - or one ships a rebuild of the testing/unstable into stable, and uses > 0.78~deb12u1 (adding a changelog entry on top of unstable's, > similarly to what would be done for backports). > > Glancing very briefly at the patch and the git tree, it seems like > you're doing the latter but versioning it like the former. I'll let > others comment as to whether that's some nitpicking that should be > ignored, or something they'd like to see adjusted. Ah, you are absolutely right, makes sense. I started with a 0.76+deb12u1 package, realized that cherry-picking ended up at 0.78, adjusted the version number … but I wasn't aware that the changelog should also be 'reset' to the one from 0.78 (which, I agree, makes perfectly sense). If needed, I can provide another upload. Thanks and best regards, Andi
