Hi, On 2023-06-03 08:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Since there was good progress on the arm64 console thing (#1036952), and > considering the current results of the investigation as to where vt102 > comes from, and why arm64 isn't quite the deciding factor (a busybox > limitation instead), I'd be happy to consider getting an updated > rootskel for migration before pseudo-RC 5 and 12.0.0. Such an upload > would need to happen quickly though… (ema bcc'd, as possible uploader, > no obligations though!).
I see that Samuel took care of the rootskel upload. Thanks! ema
