I've downloaded and tested the images. and it seems the issue has been present since alpha 1
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:11 PM Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Ismail Arif <ismxilx...@gmail.com> (2023-05-19): > > Seems the problem still persists on both modes, so it might be something > > else. > > > > In bullseye there's no such issues > > > > Trying to run the vm in windows too seems to output the same issue. > > > > Either it's a virtualbox issue or a bookworm issue is yet to be > identified, > > as booting the image on my baremetal efi seems fine, also in vmware > > workstation, there is no issue. > > Yeah, from the screenshot you shared, it didn't look like the same > framebuffer issue I've been chasing lately (wrong width, height, bits > per pixel being reported, leading to corrupted graphics in both modes). > > I'll keep *not* including vboxvideo.ko at this time, and we'll need > someone to understand what's going on, or at least what changed and > when… > > If you feel like walking down memory lane, you could try earlier Alpha > or RC releases, and let us know which one(s) is(are) affected by this > issue. You'll find all netinst images under these directories: > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/ > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_alpha2/amd64/iso-cd/ > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/ > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_rc2/amd64/iso-cd/ > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_rc3/amd64/iso-cd/ > > Thanks for the report and your follow-ups so far! > > > Cheers, > -- > Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> > D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant >
