Hi, Cesar Enrique Garcia Dabo <cqu...@arcor.de> (2023-02-27): > Thank you for the answer. Good to know that it is a known issue and is being > taken care of. > > Regarding why I took that image. I just followed the official Debian > webpages: > > https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/index.en.html
Many thanks for the follow-up… > From there I clicked on "Official CD/DVD images of the "testing" > distribution (/regenerated weekly/) > <https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/>" > > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ -> amd64 -> iso-cd -> > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso > > So from my perspective I wasn't using a "random" image, but rather an > official one, as the web pages indicate. … now I understand what you went through. Unfortunately, I wasn't aware of those instructions, and that looks utterly buggy. How can we claim to publish “official images” that are snapshots, built using debian-installer daily builds, that can be broken by random packages in unstable, and left unfixed for weeks?! We already have specific instructions on the d-i page[1] regarding *actual* official releases (as soon as testing gets an Alpha 1), plus snapshots. My first instinct would be to entirely scrap testing-related things from the page you started from[2], and just redirect to [1] instead. 1. https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ 2. https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ That link should be updated too… http://debian-cd.debian.net/ Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
