On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 22:53, Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> wrote: > > El 23/2/23 a las 22:26, Luca Boccassi escribió: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 20:50, Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> wrote: > >> The buildds already did the switch several months ago. > > > > Wait, what? Specific changes were made to debootstrap in order to > > allow the buildd machines to stay un-merged, as the CTTE wanted, > > Can you elaborate on that? What you say sounds as something that > could be said two years ago before the release of bullseye, i.e. > newly installed systems have usr-merge by default but we keep > building packages on not usr-merged chroots. > > > When did the switch happen, and how? > > I believe it was sometime in 2022-11, but I can't tell for sure. I believe it > happened because I sometimes monitor debian-bugs-rc and at some point bugs > about packages which FTBFS on usr-merged systems became serious. > > Sorry not to be more precise. I hope somebody who knows better can answer. > > ( In case it's confirmed that the buildds are already using usr-merge for > bookworm > and sid, would you agree that the debootstrap program in bookworm should do > the > same by default? )
Please see: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2022/09/msg00005.html
