Hi, Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it> wrote (Sun, 28 Aug 2022 09:19:53 +0200): > > Dear debconf and cdebconf maintainers, > > you probably have seen the bugs reports [1] and the MRs [2,3] that I > recently opened related to the creation and the use of `debconf-common`. > > With these changes [4,5,6] applied (and a few unrelated changes) I have > been able to mmdebootstrap a number of VMs in which classic debconf is > not used at all, neither at installation time nor afterward. > > I'm confident that a debconf-free unstable for base systems could be > achieved before the freeze with little effort. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1018261 > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-debconf/debconf/-/merge_requests/11 > [3] https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/cdebconf/-/merge_requests/17 > [4] https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/debconf/-/commits/debconf-common-pkg > [5] https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/cdebconf/-/commits/depend-debconf-common > [6] https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/cdebconf/-/commits/independence
Any objections against this approach? Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
