Hi,
Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> (2021-05-31):
> Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
>
> On 2021-05-31 01:07:11 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
> >
> > Please unblock package klibc
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > The NMU contains a fix for #943425 (save/restore correct set of
> > registers across *{set,long}jmp) which is RC on s390x, which is
> > a release architecture.
> >
> > [ Impact ]
> > klibc-built binaries on s390x can malfunction.
> >
> > [ Tests ]
> > The mksh testsuite catches this. Today’s mksh upload’s buildd log
> > on s390x shows that the fix works. An S/390 expert provided the
> > correct set of registers to save/restore. I’ve compared it to the
> > glibc implementation afterwards, and it matches, so I believe it
> > to be correct.
> >
> > [ Risks ]
> > klibc is rather critical; it’s part of booting and installing (so
> > this also needs an udeb unblock). The patch affects s390x only,
> > as far as I can tell, but I believe it necessary there.
> >
> > [ Checklist ]
> > [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> > [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> >
> > [ Other info ]
> > This will need an udeb unblock; what do I need to do for this?
>
> By adding Cyril (as d-i RM) and debian-boot@l.d.o to CC. Done now.Declaring myself incompetent regarding s390x, but as that seems highly targeted at that arch, and since other archs like amd64 I run tests on don't seem to regress: no objections. :) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
