On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 17:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@debian.org> (2021-05-15): > > Yes. That scsi-modules support bites back now. I just forgot about > > it > > completely. My intent was to not duplicate another architecture > > list > in > > d/rules, and in trying to simplify things, it has just fallen apart > > with this old oddity of support on armel. > > I'm happy to provide (and test) a patch that would only hardcode the > list in debian/control, and make sure the extra steps aren't run from > debian/rules. If you like the idea, you might get a patch in the next > few hours.
That'd be nice of you. So, yes, please. And you'd be the next best team (debian-boot) to test that feature as it is specific to d-i. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
