Hi! On 5/3/21 8:36 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > From skimming through the bug log, it seems it was initially a sparc64 > problem, that was fixed in the kernel (inconsistent naming) eventually.
Correct. > The same issue exists on s390x but isn't apparently going to get fixed > so we need to have d-i be smarter (hence the merge request)? Seems so. > I'd suggest at least retitling the bug report to mention s390x (release > arch, affected) instead of sparc64 (port arch, no longer affected), to > lower the chances people could overlook this issue, thinking it's only > about a port arch. We could also unmerge #926539 and #961056 again, then close the former bug which was sparc64-specific. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
