On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:39:13PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-11-24 20:18:15 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > At some point, could we please have a combined / single diff between > > the current 1.1.1d-0+deb10u3 and the proposed 1.1.1h-0+deb10u1 (I > > assume)? > > Please find attached the diff between 1.1.1d-0+deb10u4 and the proposed > 1.1.1i-0+deb10u1. > > The i release in unstable managed to migrate to testing. It was blocked > due to ci by m2crypto and swi-prolog. The swi-prolog issue got fixed in > unstable (the testuite was updated) and is not an issue in stable (the > package builds, the testsuite gets ignored). > The m2crypto issue is a different story and is still open in BTS > (#977655). I *think* someone added an override or the ci-system was kind > to Kurt/me and looked the other way :) > The m2crypto package in stable and bpo will FTBFS with the updated > openssl package. > > I'm not aware of other issues.
I think there are at least 2 upstream issues since the 1.1.1i release we want to fix first. As far as I know, they haven't been fixed upstream yet. Kurt
