On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:36:44AM +0100, john doe wrote: > On 12/12/2020 11:37 PM, Mathieu Van Nieuwenhuyse wrote: > > stappers wrote: > > > > > > There are now two options: > > > > > > A: Closing this bugreport > > > B: Keep this bugreport open for "fix bug" > > > > > > > > > Option A is a clear path. > > > > > > What do you expect from option B? > > > > > Closing the case is fine with me. > > > > I would have expected the installation to skip the "unknown" device to > > use the known one, that's why I wanted to report this, but it's more up > > to you to choose if it's worth the time to check this . > > > > I can confirm this as well
Confirming what? * skip unknown device?? * wanted to report this?? * if it's worth the time to check this > and don't understand why this bug has been closed. > > Closing the case is fine with me. > To 'Mathieu Van Nieuwenhuyse', does it help if you use the kernel boot > parameter 'interface' (1) to specify the desired interface? > > > 1) https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/ch05s03.html.en > @Mathieu: this mailinglist posting was Bcc-ed to you Regards Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse