Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> (2020-04-14): > I thought having xattr and ACL support in an rsync-udeb did make sense, > because as you say, if you want to use it to initialize a filesystem > then you probably want all file attributes to be preserved as much as > possible. libattr might not be used on some arches depending on the > glibc support which has provided the syscall wrappers for some time > now. > > > Guillem, please give me a heads up in case you think this is a good > > argument for providing libacl1-udeb, in such case I will stop > > investigating how to build rsync without having it symlinked to the > > lib. > > Yeah, I think it does, otherwise I'd not have asked for an ack from > the d-i team. :) This is possibly slightly more overhead when the freeze > comes around, but several of the packages I maintain already ship udebs, > so this is soemthing I already need to keep in mind. > > Thanks, > Guillem
Alright, feel free to go ahead, then. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature