Hi, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: > >> >> One silly question: what media are you using with the Thinkpad? Is it > >> >> the same USB stick (or whatever) every time? Can you verify it's > >> >> written OK? > >> > > >> >I used the same USB stick for alpha1 and alpha2, re-flashing it over and > >> >over again. > >> >And I have checked installation media integrity with alpha2, it reports > >> >no error, "image is valid". > >> > >> Hmmm, OK. Wondering what's causing this then. I'll try another > >> installation test on a physical machine and get back to you. > > > >I noticed a difference between a alpha1 and alpha2 install on the Thinkpad: > >in alpha1 I get the message that the new Debian seems to be the only OS > >on the machine. However, on alpha2 install I did not get that message. > > > >But I see no relevant changing in os-prober between alpha1 and 2 which > >would explain that ... > > > >I wonder if it's a kernel issue somehow? > > Hmmm. Can you try wiping the partition table in between tests?
I already tried that on wednesday, with no success. However, today it does the trick! Success! Curious, but installation completed fine. Will see, if I can reproduce it again... Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
