Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:33:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#137992: base installation fails because of missing package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2002 12:41:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 12 06:41:28 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from paprika.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.22.53] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16klap-0005at-00; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:41:28 -0600
Received: from pitt (helo=localhost)
        by paprika.inf.tu-dresden.de with local-esmtp (Exim/Debian)
        id 16klai-0006UF-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:41:20 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:41:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: base installation fails because of missing package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: installation
Version: 3.0 (Woody)

Hi Debian team!

Yesterday I downloaded the unofficial 'Woody' (testing) CD images. The
installation of the base system files fails, the installer says:

        Couldn't download pppoeconf

This package is indeed not on the first CDROM. I already tried the
following alternatives:

* downloading an image from a different mirror
* checking md5sums (all were okay)
* building a jigdo image today
* net installation over ftp from ftp.de.debian.org

All of these failed.

I already installed a Debian system half a year ago (with older
images) and it worked.

Suggestion: either include pppoeconf in the first CD image or make it
optional (it is used only with DSL install, isn't it?)

Nevertheless, many thanks for this great Linux Distri!

Bye, Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt
FSR Informatik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 137992-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2002 13:34:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 12 07:34:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16kmQ0-0008Cd-00; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:34:20 -0600
Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de 
        by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
        id 16kmPa-0006Gs-0T; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:33:54 +0100
Received: from zombie (520064145672-0001@[217.85.208.217]) by fwd10.sul.t-online.com
        with esmtp id 16kmPX-0JEb6uC; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:33:51 +0100
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 16kmPW-0000Sp-00; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:33:50 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 14:33:49 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eduard Bloch)
To: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#137992: base installation fails because of missing package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Moin Martin!
Martin Pitt schrieb am Tuesday, den 12. March 2002:

> Package: installation
> Version: 3.0 (Woody)

No, you do not use 3.0 since it is not released.

> Yesterday I downloaded the unofficial 'Woody' (testing) CD images. The
> installation of the base system files fails, the installer says:
> 
>       Couldn't download pppoeconf
> 
> This package is indeed not on the first CDROM. I already tried the
> following alternatives:

It should be there. Ask your CD vendor why she uses outdated set of
basedebs with new boot-floppies.

MfG,
Eduard.
-- 
Profitip No. 413:
Zeit sparen durch Rebooten im Hintergrund.
Man will ja nicht jedesmal die Arbeit unterbrechen...
> reboot &


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to