On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 15:35:00 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > Ok. I have added an unblock and age-days 8 hint. Also CC'ing KiBi for a > d-i ack before adding an unblock-udeb hint.
This is now only waiting for a d-i ack, and I haven't had any regression reports. Any opinions? Full details: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929132#5 The only change that I think could possibly cause regressions for d-i's use case (AT-SPI) is that the tighter validation in bus/desktop-file.c could break AT-SPI if it ships syntactically invalid .service files, but /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.a11y.Bus.service and /usr/share/dbus-1/accessibility-services/org.a11y.atspi.Registry.service both seem valid, so that shouldn't be an issue. smcv
