Hello! > On Jan 12, 2019, at 10:02 AM, Yao Wei (魏銘廷) <m...@debian.org> wrote: > > or we can follow task-chinese-s-desktop and use fcitx instead of ibus in > task-chinese-t-desktop: > > fcitx, > fcitx-chewing, > fcitx-table, > im-config, > fonts-arphic-ukai, > fonts-arphic-uming, > fonts-noto, # this seems to be unnecessary, but not really sure. > fonts-noto-cjk, > libreoffice-l10n-zh-tw, > libreoffice-help-zh-tw, > firefox-esr-l10n-zh-tw | firefox-l10n-zh-tw, > poppler-data
I haven’t yet understood why people are moving to fcitx. I have tried it myself after it was automatically installed on my openSUSE machine to replace iBus and found it completely unusable. I didn’t even manage to get any input languages added. I am using iBus for writing Japanese and I consider it the superior and simpler-to-use solution. Is there anything that fcitx is supposed to do better than iBus? Adrian
