On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 02:38:46PM +0000, peter green wrote: >On 19/01/19 04:27, Wookey wrote: >> >> Steve (McIntyre) and I have been thinking about what to do about this, >> so did some investigation and came up with a plan. Essentially it was >> to run d-i on both if they are configured/available. This way anyone >> looking at just one or the other will see D-I as they expect. The >> patch is not intrusive and essentially nothing changes if there is >> only one console so this should be a low-risk change. > >One concern I would have is preseeding or other more-automated >install modes. Presumablly this works out ok on a "normal" install >because the instance of the installer that the user is *NOT* >interacting with just sits there doing nothing but I would question >if that is a reasonable assumption in general.
Ah, yes. Definitely worth checking on once we have something up and running. We might need to make sure that only one of the running d-i instances works like this. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
