Hi Raphaël, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> (2018-08-21): > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > It's not a problem, but we can improve it, IMO (so severity is low). > > So you tried to fix a non-problem... and while doing so you introduced > a real problem. > > While cleaning up the list of scripts to keep, you decided to drop the > scripts for all derivatives making it impossible to use the udeb built > for Debian on any derivative (Kali bug report here: > https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=4921) > > So you saved a few kilobytes and made the life harder for others. > IMO it was the wrong decision. > > The other bug that you fixed at the same time asked to add more scripts, > it did not ask to remove any. > > If you really want to do anything at this level, you should just have > a list of obsolete release and automatically drop the corresponding > scripts. But IMO this is not worth the effort. We should just keep all > scripts.
Right. Feel free to fix/revert this at your earliest convenience. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
