Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Holger, > > Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2018-08-13): > > Hi Cyril, hi all, > > > > now that I have did some uploads for d-i packages, mostly with l10n updates, > > there are some packages left for uploading, which I'm unsure about or which > > I left out by intend: > > > > > > - arcboot-installer build fails. "no binary artefacts" > > - s390-dasd build fails. "no binary artefacts" > > - s390-netdevice build fails. "no binary artefacts" > > - zipl-installer build fails. "no binary artefacts" > > Indeed, I see how one can be surprised at first. It happened to me too a > few years ago! ;) > > Those are only useful (therefore built) on a few architectures. You can > see that in the Architecture field of their debian/control file. If > you're looking at l10n changes, (source-)uploading looks good. But maybe > keep an eye on the build logs to make sure there are no new FTBFSes > (failure to build from source):
Ok, so I need some more chroots for other architectures, I assume. That will take me some days I think... > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=arcboot-installer > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=s390-dasd > etc. > > It's a good idea to do so for things you've built locally, but it can > be a bit of a burden to check all packages… I'll end up seeing what > packages don't migrate on the long run, so I'll notice anyway. Anyone > can, looking at the udebs (second part) with an old age: > > https://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html > > > - cdebconf-terminal when comparing 0.33.dsc against 0.34.dsc, there are > > masses of deletions (not declared in the changelog file; > > and I cannot find any commit that could have caused > > this; > > so this is most probably a wrong way of building the > > package or the like ?) > > Sometimes the previous uploader has an unclean git tree, and include > some extraneous files, which then show up as deletions. Rebuilding a > source package from the 0.33 git tag, I see these changes when compared > against the one in the archive: > > aclocal.m4 | 171 -- > config.guess | 1530 ---------------------- > config.sub | 1782 -------------------------- > configure | 4035 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > 4 files changed, 7518 deletions(-) > > … which you can in turn ignore. Ok, cdebconf-terminal uploaded. > > > - choose-mirror For the next buster d-i alpha release to happen, there > > seems > > to be one more upload needed anyway (to update from > > mirrors.masterlist). So I did not upload just for l10n. > > Right, I can do that. > > > - console-setup non-trivial changings included > > Feel free to upload that one. console-setup done. > > > - flash-kernel non-trivial changings included > > Not an expert here, I'd check with Vagrant. > > > - lilo-installer non-trivial changes ? (source.lintian-overrides) > > Is that the right package? > > kibi@armor:~/debian-installer/packages/lilo-installer$ git diff --stat 1.57.. > debian/changelog | 6 ++++++ > debian/control | 4 ++-- > debian/po/he.po | 4 ++-- > debian/po/sv.po | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > Either way, we don't really support lilo, so… ;) The additional change was on "source.lintian-overrides", but since we ignore different lintian warnings for udebs anyway, that's just one more here ... Uploaded. > > - preseed additional changes (mark 'checksum error' strings as > > translatable, which have been introduced in Stretch > > development cycle) > > I'd defer to l10n-knowledgeable people for that one. :) The relevant change was proposed by bubulle, so I assume everything is fine with this? I will try to get an answer from him on this. > > - tasksel many other, non-trivial changings included > > Right package? > > kibi@armor:~/debian-installer/packages/tasksel$ git diff --stat 3.44.. > debian/changelog | 7 +++++++ > debian/po/de.po | 8 +++++--- > debian/po/pt_BR.po | 8 ++++---- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) I miss-read the changelog. Everything fine here. Uploaded. Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Finterprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
