On 07/31/2018 03:16 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > I'm finding the need to apologize for neglecting to communicate to the > debian-installer development community over some BoF sessions at the > last two DebConfs regarding alternatives to and possible replacements > for debian-installer. > > In retrospect, it was a terribly obvious oversight in communication, and > doubly so that it happened two years in a row. I can even see that the > language used in the talk descriptions could be interpreted poorly. All > I can really do at this point is apologize and promise to do better in > the future, for whatever that is worth. > > I hate the thought that I've contributed to anyone's demotivation. Truly > sorry. > > I admire and benefit from the work of the debian-installer > developers. I've used it regularly for many years, recommend it to > others. Despite seeing some issues with it and dreaming of alternatives, > I'll continue to contribute to d-i where and when I can, and intend to > continue to do so for the forseeable future. > > > live well, > vagrant > > P.S. Please CC me on replies, as I'm not subscribed to debian-boot, or > feel free to reply privately if you prefer.
Hi, I also would like to add that some of us want to at least investigate ways to have d-i running over on top of libc6 first, which means more help for the d-i maintainers. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
