On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Chris Boot <bo...@debian.org> (2018-01-22): > > I think it would be helpful to start using Salsa for some of our repos. > > > > I would like to move my personal busybox work-in-progress repo to Salsa; > > I know nothing prevents me from doing that but it feels like everything > > would be more joined-up if the main busybox repo was also in Salsa and > > in a debian-boot team/group. > > If you have time/motivation to explore salsa.debian.org for d-i things, > that's more than welcome! > > > Does anyone have any objection if I create a d-i/boot team on Salsa? > > Not from me. > > > What should it be called? > > Good question. d-i looks good to me, and would match the current group > on alioth. debian-boot is historical and I think we should keep only > the list named this way (along with IRC).
Or just use "installer-team". > > Should its membership just be copied from the Alioth team? > If possible, that would look good to me. Not sure about non-DD accounts > support though (I've had too little time to keep track of salsa things, > which seemed to be fast moving). This just needs to be done by hand. > Not necessary for busybox AFAICT, but we'll need to have that later when > moving all repositories there: we need to have access for the l10n robot > (including write access), working from dillon.debian.org these days. What about the stuff still in SVN? > > Alternatively, would it be preferable to use the "Debian" group given > > we have such a large membership anyway? > I'm not sure. ISTR having seen people mention on IRC that views weren't > too practical when projects are under the Debian umbrella, because > everything is listed altogether? Maybe a separate group would be best? No, the Debian group is for single repositories, not such large lumbs. Bastian -- Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
