On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > AFAICT, the notable difference is that files are named e.g. .html.en on > the website, while they are named .html in the package. These names make > sense in their respective contexts: we need a .html extension in the > package so that it opens automatically, and we need the .en extension on > the website to get language negociation. Perhaps one can use .en.html > on the website?
The files for the main part of the website use .en.html: https://www.debian.org/index.en.html I think the website mainly uses index.en.html for language negotiation, I logged into our static mirrors and the only area that uses index.html.en are the release notes in www.d.o/releases/*/*/*.html.* and an April Fools page from a while back. https://www.debian.org/misc/canterbury > (and it's not only a question of file renaming, links in the .html files > need to be updated accordingly). That would be the main issue. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
