On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 15:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Package: apt-setup > Severity: normal > > We have a few places with a default mirror, e.g. debootstrap, and we've > had a few changes over the years with http.debian.net and other things. > Lately, we seem to have standardized on deb.debian.org, which might be a > good fallback for apt-setup too: > > kibi@armor:~/debian-installer/packages/apt-setup/generators$ git grep > ftp.debian.org > > 92updates: echo "# deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ > > ${codename}-updates $dists" >> $file > > 92updates: echo "# deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ > > ${codename}-updates $dists" >> $file > > 93backports: echo "# deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ > > ${codename}-backports $dists" >> $file > > 93backports: echo "# deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ > > ${codename}-backports $dists" >> $file > > Comments/objections?
I agree we should use deb.debian.org as a 'safe' default mirror. We should certainly not put a hostname in APT sources that doesn't correspond to a tightly synched set of servers. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
