I agree. ide-scsi is less stable than ide-cd in my experience.
Britton Kerin __ GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always." On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Would anyone mind if we use the ide-scsi driver instead of ide-cd > > as-default on the bf2.4 flavor? Additionaly, I suggest to put ide-scsi > > Well, 2.4 ide-scsi sometimes break (as in locks the drive hard) with common > (shitty) hardware, such as some 52x "creative" CDROMS (e.g. Vendor: CREATIVE > Model: CD5233E-CF Rev: 1.04). > > I suggest you guys stick to ide-cd for compatibility reasons. > > -- > "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring > them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond > where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot > Henrique Holschuh > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
