Hi,
Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > Another argument against screen-udeb by default on normal VGA console:
> > it seems to be preventing bterm from running, and thus disables a lot of
> > languages which need it. I haven't really followed what conclusion
> > there was with screen-udeb, but
> >
> > https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/netboot/mini.iso
> >
> > still has it enabled by default.
>
> Thanks for letting us know this issue!
>
> invoking screen is in script:
> -
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/rootskel.git/tree/src/sbin/debian-installer
>
> It uses system's $TERM, if bterm fails in screen, maybe it's a bug of screen?
As I am not sure what exactly is meant by "bterm": Is it the udeb
version of bogl-bterm? Or something completely different?
> > Axel, do you have any comment on this issue?
Sounds like a strong argument against enabling it by default on VGA
consoles. I'm totally fine with that. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
