On 19 March 2016 at 06:55, Anton Zinoviev <an...@lml.bas.bg> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:22:42PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> Yet another one would be to have setupcon itself detect the existence >> of the cached scripts. > > The only reason there are cached scripts is that people are complaining > that console-setup is slow at boot. The cached scripts contain the > mininum configuration sufficient to configure the console. If we run > setupcon, we don't need cached scripts. > >> Would you be OK, until further development comes along, to use a >> wrapper unit like this: > > Yes and thank you! > >> I plan to do a NMU fixing this bug via a unit like the above, please >> tell me if you want to address this in some other way. > > However, I don't think it is appropriate to do a NMU with such changes. > Instead you should make a regular upload of the package. I don't know > whether you have commit rights in the repository of Debian installer > (where the sources of console-setup are), or not, but in any case I > think you can obtain such rights in no time.
I have uploaded a new version. I have not yet, however, secured commit rights to d-i git repository. If you want to pull the changes before I get the access, you can pull the signed tag from my fork: git pull https://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/fsateler/console-setup.git debian/1.141 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
