Le Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:51:58PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Maybe this problem can be solved by the use of metapackages ? With the > > exclusion of cloud-init, specialised kernels etc., can we converge on a > > metapackage that would represent the most frequent expectations of users of > > non-minimal cloud images in Debian and elsewhere ? > > Thats what a task is, a meta-package.
Since debian-boot@l.d.o was CCed, I thought that "task" was employed to mean "a metapackage built from the tasksel source package", not just any metapackage in general. So let me rephrase: Is the proposal to go through tasksel ? If yes, what are the expected advantages over the use of an ad-hoc metapackage ? Cheers, -- Charles
